Buy-American rules shutting out Canadians – and costing Americans

May 6, 2009 at 14:05 | Posted in Canada, economics, protectionism | Leave a comment

 

Canadians have been whining for some time now about moves by Americans to buy only American goods. Well, it does indeed hurt Canadian exporters, but it certainly also hurts Americans. According to the Toronto Star, a Canadian company has lost a contract for supplying plastic pipes to a navy base in the US. But it only mentions in passing the really dumb part of the story.

But the piping [already installed] is now being ripped out of the ground. Why? Because the pipes are branded with the words Made in Canada.

How this can possibly benefit Americans eludes me. Broken window fallacy anyone?

Advertisements

Judge denies Galloway’s bid to enter Canada – or maybe not?

April 9, 2009 at 17:39 | Posted in Canada, Christopher Hitchens, Debate, George Galloway | Leave a comment

It seems that the story about Canada banning George Galloway from entering the country may not be entirely correct after all.

Galloway a shameless self-promoter? Who would have thought.

Still, I think Galloway does make good points quite often, but I think he is morally confused.

My personal favourite is this debate between Hitchens and Galloway – nothing is more amusing than have two jackasses have a go at each other (It’s more than one section, but I trust you know how to operate youtube)

Want some part of the stimulus action? Apply with this form.

December 18, 2008 at 02:05 | Posted in Canada, economy, satire, stimulus, Terence Corcoran | Leave a comment
Canada’s own brilliant libertarian – Terence Corcoran – with a major national soapbox – the Financial Post – cooked up this little beauty. What more can be said?
(Click for full view)

Stephen Harper’s Evil Genius

November 28, 2008 at 02:40 | Posted in Canada, Elections, Stephen Harper | Leave a comment

So Stephen Harper decided to pull the rug from under the feet of the Liberals: the Conservatives announced today that all public funding for political parties will cease early next year. This will hurt the bottom line of all Canadian parties, except that the Tories have a build up a really amazing funding machine that manages to collect more money through voluntary donations than any other party in Canada. Some folks within the Conservative party joke that they have enough money to finance at least two more elections out of pocket. The Liberals, however, have no such cushion. Historically, they got most of their money from big business – ironically enough – while the Tories are much more of a grassroots financed party. 

Without a real leader – their effete Stephane Dione was merely a compromise after all the frontrunners had knocked each others out – the Liberals have been to scared to risk an election until now. Every time the Tories called a confidence vote, the Liberals folded, refusing to engage in an election. Then Harper called an election – even though he had promised not to do so – and while he didn’t get his majority, the Liberals suffered their worst defeat in Canada’s history. The only reason they are still around is because of Canada’s weirdly confusing first-past-the-pole election system
Ok, enough of political theory, here’s the beef:
The opposition parties are threatening to somehow topple the government by either 
– forming a triple etente against the Tories, and asking the Governor General to give them a mandate to form a new government – which won’t last more more than a few months at best, ending up in an election sometime in spring.
– or they could vote against the government as soon as the Tories try to make the economic statement a matter of confidence. 
OR – the Liberals could do nothing, pass the statement, and risk having their financial kneecaps broken come once the funding runs out. 
In either case, the Tories will probably win:
In any case, this whole thing puts the Liberals into a real dilemma: ever since the Tories came to power as a minority government back in 2004, the Liberals have voted with them on everything that really mattered. Against their principles, against their stated objectives. They passed everything.
Only now that their finances are in trouble will they develop the guts to vote against the government. Not that anybody can blame them for it, really, but… the Tories will hang them with it: it’ll make it really easy for Harper to make them look like they are only interested in their own welfare, and like they couldn’t care less about the welfare of Canadians. 
Forcing an election NOW? In this economic crisis?
And on what platform? More stimulus? They just accused the goverment of not being financially prudent enough. They Liberals would run a deficit just like the Tories – if they claim they wouldn’t, nobody in their right mind could believe them. 
They COULD accuse the government of attacking ‘democracy’ by removing public funding – but, that’s an easy accusation to refute. After all, the Tories won’t get funding, either, and if this is a matter of democracy – what’s more democratic: people donating to a party, or the state giving money to them? 
The Liberal’s are screwed big time. I’m not saying they are doomed, but royally screwed for sure. 
For an economist who entered politics almost by accident, Harper is certainly a smart operator. Not smooth, but smart.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.